Can dimensional gauging be automated?
Presenting parts to a fixed gauge is usually better than hanging a gauge on a robot, because the metrology stays in a controlled fixture and the robot only has to be repeatable.
What the job actually is
Somebody measures features on a sample or on every part, with calipers, a gauge or a CMM, and records the result. It is slow, and on a multi cavity or multi spindle process the sampling can miss a drifting cavity for hours.
Signs it is worth automating
- You sample by hand and a drifting cavity or spindle could hide between samples.
- Measurement is slow enough to bottleneck the process.
- You need measurement data recorded for customers.
- Multi cavity or multi spindle work where per source tracking would help.
What the cell looks like
A 3 to 10 kg class arm presenting parts to fixed instruments: laser micrometer, vision system, scale or gauge. Results feed a statistical process control system so measurement becomes process feedback rather than a pass or fail gate.
This is one job inside a bigger family. The inspection guide covers the equipment classes, the cost ranges, and the disqualifiers for all of it.
When the answer is no
Read this part first
We would rather talk you out of a bad purchase than into one. If any of these describe your version of this job, the honest answer is probably not yet.
- Your tolerances need a CMM in a temperature controlled room, which is a different project.
- Volumes are low enough that hand gauging keeps up comfortably.
- You have no plan for what to do with the data once you have it.
- Nobody has established gauge repeatability and reproducibility on the current method.
What an engineer has to verify
- Gauge repeatability and reproducibility on your current manual method, as the baseline.
- Which features actually need measuring versus which are measured out of habit.
- Whether results must feed a statistical process control system and how.
- Part presentation repeatability into the gauge fixture.
- Temperature sensitivity of the measurement and of your plant.
Safety is not on that list because it is not ours to determine. Cell design, guarding and the risk assessment belong to an independent certified integrator, every time.
Someone has already done this
Robot presents all 96 cavities and cuts shot inspection time by 64 percent
Vision Technical Molding in Manchester, Connecticut runs a 96 cavity medical tool at under 10 second cycles, and qualifying a shot means checking a part from every cavity for dimen...
A 33 person molder checks 200 tiny holes in 3.5 seconds with a robot fed camera
Performance Plastics Ltd. in Cincinnati molds a fluoropolymer medical disposable four to a shot, and each part carries an area with 50 holes of 23 mil diameter separated by 12 mil ...
See it run
Two clips of this job actually running, from two different manufacturers. Both are the makers' own marketing footage, showing a cell under good conditions with a part it was set up for, so watch them for what the motion looks like rather than as evidence of what your rate would be.
Two robots move valve bodies between inspection stations that check dimensions and surface, then separate good parts from bad.
A cobot moves its onboard camera over parts and flags the defective ones on screen as they come through.
Is your version of this job automatable?
Tell Joe what you are running. He will give you a straight preliminary read, and he will tell you if a robot is the wrong answer for your situation.
More processes