SteelCollarRobotics and Aeronautics
Ground JoeAir AmeliaOrbit KatherineGovernments Abe
Home / Equipment / Compare / Denso HM-4060 vs Epson G20-851

Side by side

Denso HM-4060 vs Epson G20-851

Two scara arms a buyer shopping for machine tending would honestly weigh against each other, with the manufacturer-published figures in one table and a plain reading of what the differences mean on a floor. We sell across brands, so we have no reason to tilt it.

Denso HM-4060Epson G20-851
ClassSCARA armSCARA arm
Payload10 kg (22 lb)10 kg (22 lb)
Reach600 mm850 mm
Sold as collaborativenono
Applications listedpick and place, packaging, machine tendingmaterial movement, machine tending, packaging
Specs checked2026-08-222026-08-23

Every figure is a manufacturer-published claim, checked on the date shown against the maker's own material, and not one of them survives contact with your part, your rate and your floor without an applications review. Prices are deliberately absent: quotes are prepared by our team and confirmed with the manufacturer.

What the numbers mean on the floor

What a spec sheet cannot tell you

The gripper, the fixture and the integrator decide more of the outcome than the arm. Cycle time on your part is a test, not a datasheet figure. Service footprint, spare parts and who answers the phone at 2 AM differ by brand and by state. And the price difference between two arms in the same class is usually smaller than the difference between two integrators' quotes for the same cell. A model number is not a specification, and the gripper is the project.

From our matrix

Denso HM-4060. Cycle published as approx 0.2 s. Denso lists a 20 kg sibling, the HM-4A60.

Epson G20-851. Legacy, superseded by the GX20. RATED 10 kg, max 20 kg. Cycle 0.37 s. IP54 or IP65.

Also on the shortlist for machine tending

Ask about these two for your job

Free, about two minutes, no phone number. Joe will tell you which belongs on your shortlist, what beats both, and what has to be true for the math to work.