Can press fit assembly be automated?
Insertion is where force sensing earns its money. A position controlled robot either misses the hole or breaks the part; a force controlled one finds it the way a person does.
What the job actually is
Somebody presses a bearing, pin, bushing or connector into a mating part. Success depends on alignment and on feeling when something is not seating correctly.
Signs it is worth automating
- The insertion is repetitive and the components are consistent.
- Bad seats are escaping and causing warranty or rework cost.
- Operators report strain from press or insertion force.
- You need insertion force recorded for traceability.
What the cell looks like
A 3 to 16 kg class arm with a force torque sensor, or a collaborative arm with built in force sensing, over a fixture. The sensor lets the cell search for the hole and detect a bad seat rather than driving blindly.
This is one job inside a bigger family. The assembly and screwdriving guide covers the equipment classes, the cost ranges, and the disqualifiers for all of it.
When the answer is no
Read this part first
We would rather talk you out of a bad purchase than into one. If any of these describe your version of this job, the honest answer is probably not yet.
- Component tolerances are loose enough that a chamfer would fix the problem more cheaply.
- Volumes are low and an arbor press with a fixture is sufficient.
- The parts are fragile enough that any misalignment destroys them and your fixture cannot guarantee alignment.
- You have not measured what insertion force actually is on good and bad parts.
What an engineer has to verify
- Actual insertion force profile measured on good and bad assemblies.
- Component tolerance stack and whether a chamfer or lead in would help.
- Whether force data must be recorded per unit.
- Fixture location accuracy against the required alignment.
- What the cell does with a detected bad seat: reject, retry or flag.
Safety is not on that list because it is not ours to determine. Cell design, guarding and the risk assessment belong to an independent certified integrator, every time.
Someone has already done this
Screwdriving and box erecting at a fourth generation toolmaker
Darex, the family owned Oregon company behind the Work Sharp brand, assembles consumer knife sharpeners with many small screws in plastic housings. One cobot now drives screws into...
A rented cobot rebuilt quality on a Miami electronics line
Creating Revolutions, a small Miami company, assembles a puck sized service pager for restaurants and hotels. Manual soldering, drilling, and silicone dispensing produced double di...
See it run
Two clips of this job actually running, from two different manufacturers. Both are the makers' own marketing footage, showing a cell under good conditions with a part it was set up for, so watch them for what the motion looks like rather than as evidence of what your rate would be.
A robot with a screwdriver tool picks up screws and drives them into a product one after another, catching any screw that does not seat right.
At a parts maker, a cobot drives the fasteners on each unit coming down the line, doing the repetitive screw work a person used to do.
Is your version of this job automatable?
Tell Joe what you are running. He will give you a straight preliminary read, and he will tell you if a robot is the wrong answer for your situation.
More processes